The European Commission’s Harrie Temmink, who told ICE the other day that EU-wide online gambling legislation would maybe not occur in his life time ‘or the next.’
The European Commission (EC) has abandoned the idea of a pan-European regulatory framework for online gambling, accepting that each member states mostly oppose synchronizing their Internet gaming laws. The move interestingly mirrors comparable problems in the usa, where states’ rights vs. federal dictates have grown to be an ongoing battle in the iGaming wars.
Talking at last week’s International Casino Exhibition in London (ICE), Harrie Temmink told the industry emphatically that the EC was not working on sector-specific legislation in gambling.
‘The Commission is not proposing it and will perhaps not propose it,’ he said. ‘Not in my lifetime or the following.’
Temmink leads the gambling team product and chairs the EC’s Professional Group on Gambling Services.
This is usually a cry that is far the EC’s previous stance. In 2011, Internal Market and Services Commissioner Michel Barnier proposed a framework that is eu-wide to protecting consumers and citizens, preventing fraudulence, and maintaining the integrity of activities.
EU Action Plan
Barnier’s view at that time was that ‘the prevailing regulatory, societal and technical [online gambling] issues in the EU’ could not be ‘tackled adequately by user states individually.’
‘This is very true given the cross-border dimension of on the web gambling,’ he said in 2012, when it had been announced that the EC would prepare an ‘action plan’ to make clear the regulation regarding the sector and encourage cooperation between member states.
The EC frowned regarding the regulatory steps which had been used France, Italy, and Spain, which saw those markets ring-fenced and operators taxed at a higher level, in apparent conflict with EU ideals of free movement of services between member states.
Barnier’s plan had beenn’t proposing a single licensing that is EU, but instead had the goal of ensuring that member states adopted its vision for a more liberal regulatory landscape across Europe. User states that declined to play ball would be sanctioned, then in Barnier’s vision.
But Barnier left the post in 2014, and his successor, Günther Oettinger, seems less zealous about pushing the cause and more resigned to regulation that is leaving individual jurisdictions.
More Fragmented than Ever
As Temmink explained, ‘I can assure you that if we proposed legislation on gambling, in the first meeting with the Council, we would have 26 out of 28 member states that could be fiercely opposed to the proposition.
‘It could be suicide 888 casino pokies,’ he added.
Since Barnier outlined his plan in 2012, a wave of brand new regulation has spread across Europe, and numerous licensing that is new have sprung up, from the British to Portugal. Europe has become even less coordinated on the iGaming front, therefore the fragmented regulatory landscape proves a greater challenge to operators than ever.
‘Operators need to truly have a license for the certain country in that they offer games, without having to be able to count on the recognition of licenses between one European country and another,’ said Temmink. ‘For their part is for the Member States to make sure a system that is non-discriminatory of licenses.’
Nevada Voters Courted by Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders, Democratic Caucus Will Be Key
Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton are focused on reaching as many Nevada voters as possible prior to the Silver State caucuses on Feb. 23rd in what is shaping up to be a make-or-break point within the campaign that is democratic. (Image: Jim Young/Reuters)
Nevada voters are the focal point for both Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders’ campaigns right now, as the two Democratic presidential nominees make an effort to persuade as many last-minute voters to vote for them before this week’s February 23rd caucus.
The Silver State had long been thought to be her roadblock to stop any Bernie Sanders momentum after Clinton’s narrow victory in Iowa, followed by a hefty defeat in New Hampshire. She once held a lead that is nearly 50-point her challengers, but Sanders’ grassroots movement has severely tightened the race, with many analysts now believing Nevada is up for grabs.
Clinton and Sanders each invested the weekend making stops around the state. Sanders campaigned in Reno on Saturday, then Las Vegas on Sunday, while their opponent met with voters in several places across the gaming mecca throughout the weekend.
The two Democrats concluded the weekend on Sunday at the Victory Missionary Baptist Church in Las Vegas, a congregation largely made up of African-Americans.
‘we send a profound message to the entire country, and that message is that the people of this country will no longer accept establishment politics,’ Sanders said during his brief remarks if we can win here in Nevada.
Clinton responded to Sanders with line as vague as Bernie’s plan of just how he will fund his utopian vision.
‘I am maybe not a single issue candidate,’ Clinton said. ‘ Because if we were going to quickly attain everything about banking institutions and money and politics, would that end racism?’
Say what now?
Nevada Key State in Runoff
When Sanders officially announced their decision to operate for the presidency in May, the so-called ‘Clinton machine’ was currently planning to work in Nevada. Volunteers were making hundreds of daily calls, going door-to-door, and obtaining endorsements from key state and local leaders.
The Vermont senator didn’t have much of an opportunity, at least according to pundits that are political.
Fast-forward nine months, and Clinton just canceled an event in Florida this week to stay the course in Nevada and shake every hand, ascend each phase, and grasp every microphone she can before Nevadans head to caucus on Saturday.
Nevada has a long history of being truly a swing state in the general presidential election, and its constituents have actually a nearly perfect record of voting for the winner that is eventual. Since 1912, Nevada has precisely picked the president that is next except for in 1976, when Nevada went along to Gerald Ford over Jimmy Carter.
A win in Nevada for Clinton will be expected, while a win for Sanders pull down exactly what would perhaps end up being the biggest political upset in modern history.
Neck-in-Neck to the Finish
Nevada is home to the gambling epicenter of the United States, so perhaps it is appropriate that there surely is small evidence that is statistical operate on in determining which candidate will win on Saturday.
The reality is that gambling on Clinton or Sanders is equivalent to wagering on black or red. The most recent poll from TargetPoint, the very first political data on the race since late December, has Clinton and Sanders tied 45-45.
Scalia Death Further Stirs the Pot
Adding towards the intensity of it all, Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia passed away on Saturday in Texas of apparent natural factors at the chronilogical age of 79. Appointed to the bench by President Reagan in 1986, the consistently conservative judge’s death leaves a vacancy on the greatest court that is already causing more political divide between Republicans and Democrats.
A bunch of names have previously been tossed around, including Nevada that is current Governor Sandoval (R). A welcomed compromise to both conservative and liberal congressional leaders though Sandoval’s GOP label might make him seem unlikely for an Obama endorsement, his pro-choice and pro-immigration views could make the first Silver State governor of Hispanic heritage.
Nevada Gaming Regulator Michonne Ascuaga Resigns Over Alleged Sparks Nugget Improprieties
Michonne Ascuaga, that has resigned from the Nevada Gaming Commission in the wake of the news that a property she formerly managed with her family, the Sparks Nugget in northern Nevada, is being examined for lax anti-money laundering controls. (Image: ktvn.com)
Michonne Ascuaga has resigned from her post regarding the Nevada Gaming Commission, following the revelation of alleged improprieties that are financial the Sparks Nugget, the casino in northern Nevada that she handled for 16 years.
The Nugget will be examined by the U.S. Department of Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) over allegations that it failed to comply with financial regulations during Ascuaga’s tenure, and neglected to establish an effective anti-money laundering system.
The investigation stumbled on light in a court filing last week, as section of a longstanding contractual lawsuit brought by the Ascuaga family from the casino’s new owners, Wolfhound Holdings, the private investment team that purchased the property in 2013.
Sandoval Unaware of Investigation
April a spokeswoman for Nevada Governor Brian Sandoval said that Sandoval was unaware of the investigation when he appointed Ascuaga to the Gaming Commission panel last.
‘Michonne Ascuaga has served the Nevada Gaming Commission well,’ penned Brian Sandoval in accepting the resignation. ‘I admire her and desire to recognize her family members’ long history as leaders within the gaming industry.
‘I appreciate he added that she has put the credibility and reputation of the Gaming Commission first. ‘Michonne is a consummate professional and will continue to be a leader in our community.’
Ascuaga has claimed in a statement that is official she ‘did not purposely hold back information from the governor.’
‘The Sparks Nugget ended up being informed in November 2013 by the Department of Treasury that the Department had been investigating she added whether it was appropriate to impose civil penalties for possible violations of anti-money laundering regulations. ‘The matter arose from an audit-type assessment conducted by the IRS at the casino in 2010. This is all disclosed immediately towards the buyer.’
It’s alleged that the Nugget is being investigated for laxity in its reporting and record-keeping requirements. By law, all businesses must file a Currency Transaction Report on all deals over $10,000, and report any activity that is suspicious FinCEN, as a means of guarding against money-laundering.
Ascuaga could be the daughter of John L. Ascuaga, the son of a Basque shepherd who owned the Nugget for over 50 years before its sale to Wolfhound. The Ascuaga household believes it is still owed $500,000 beneath the purchase and sale agreement of the Nugget.
Ascuaga said she was resigning ‘out of deep respect for the Nevada Gaming Commission and also to not allow myself to become an unnecessary distraction from the important regulatory oversight work it does.’